fbpx

Stopping a Dangerous Article V Convention

The only way to defend our values against this threat is if ordinary people like us step up to make a difference. Join the fight today.

Save the Constitution. GOP and Dem legislators agree: Don’t be conned by the Con-Con | Opinion

BY REP. ILANA RUBEL AND REP. JUDY BOYLE
FEBRUARY 18, 2024

“Washington at Constitutional Convention of 1787, signing of U.S. Constitution” by Junius Brutus Stearns Public Domain We are of different political parties and often disagree, but are allied in our fierce devotion to America’s Constitution. It is now under serious threat from well-meaning people who seek a Constitutional Convention.

There are two ways to alter the U.S. Constitution. The first –and only way our Constitution has ever been amended in its 237-year history – is for Congress to propose an amendment and pass it by a two-thirds vote. Then three-fourths of the states must ratify. Everybody sees the amendment language and knows exactly what they’re voting on.

But there’s another untested way to alter the Constitution. A Constitutional Convention, or “Con-Con”, can be requested by two-thirds of the state legislatures. There has only been one such Convention – when the Constitution was written in 1787. Unlike the amendment approach, a Con-Con opens up the whole Constitution to be rewritten as the delegates decide. Alterations could not be reliably limited to a particular, known proposal; delegates could concoct changes on the fly to anything or everything. There are no set rules determining how the delegates holding such staggering power would be chosen. We would be counting on a dysfunctional Congress to set these rules.

This session, three resolutions are pending in the Idaho Senate calling for a Con-Con: SCR112, SCR114 and SCR115. Advocates will assure you that their sole purpose is to pass a balanced budget amendment or some other benign-sounding tweak. But there is no basis to believe that the agenda can be safely contained. Once a Convention is called, everything is on the chopping block. The Constitutional protection of our rights – free speech, gun rights, a jury of our peers – all could be restricted or even eliminated by unelected delegates. Even the ratification requirement by three-quarters of the states could be removed.

History rebuts the idea that in a Con-Con, delegates’ powers could be restricted to a single item. The original 1787 Constitutional Convention was called solely to ratify the Articles of Confederation, but the delegates ignored that limitation and drafted our current Constitution, including new ratification rules. Top legal scholars across the ideological spectrum, from Justice Scalia to Harvard’s Professor Tribe, have agreed that subject limitations could not be enforced once a Constitutional Convention begins.

If you think this sounds far-fetched, think again. Twenty-seven states have already called for a Con-Con, and once that number hits thirty-four, Congress must convene it. Idaho is one of only seven states standing in the way of a potential gutting of our founding document, and proponents are working overtime to hit the tipping point. Some powerful Idaho legislators have this as a top priority for this session.

The public must loudly tell their legislators not to risk a runaway convention that could gut our precious Constitution. We agree that federal debt should be reined in and government could be improved across the board. But there are many ways to do so without taking unconscionable risks with the document that is the foundation of America’s freedom and prosperity. This is not a partisan issue — it’s a matter that ought to concern all Americans.

Our Founding Fathers created the Con-Con option to use in case the American experiment proved to be a failure and needed a complete overhaul. That is not the case. Our nation is an unprecedented success. America has been a beacon of freedom for centuries and remains the wealthiest, most powerful nation on Earth. We cannot stand by and watch the uniquely inspired document that enabled this success placed at risk. Let’s solve our problems using the many political tools we already have, and not jeopardize our Constitution.

Rep. Ilana Rubel is a Democrat from Boise. Rep. Judy Boyle is a Republican from Midvale.

Related News

KC Becker: Constitutional convention could spell chaos for democracy

KC Becker, who lives in Boulder and represents District 13, is the now the Speaker of the Colorado House of Representatives. She penned this op-ed on September 25, 2018, while majority leader. We deserve a democracy that puts hardworking Coloradans ahead of wealthy special interests and the well-connected. No one can deny the powerful influence […]

Read More >

Inside Mike Johnson’s Ties to a Far-Right Movement to Gut the Constitution

The new House speaker has longstanding ties to the evangelical inspired Convention of States cause. As the interregnum without a speaker of the House came to an end last month, people from across the political spectrum came together, in a rare show of unity, to ask a single question: Who in the world is Mike […]

Read More >

Assembly Passes Resolution Ensuring Decades Old Calls for Constitutional Conventions Aren’t Manipulated for Future, Unrelated Purposes

News Release Assembly Speaker Carl E. Heastie FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 20, 2024 Assembly Passes Resolution Ensuring Decades Old Calls for Constitutional Conventions Aren’t Manipulated for Future, Unrelated Purposes Speaker Carl Heastie and Assemblymember Ken Zebrowski today announced that the Assembly passed a resolution rescinding all previous applications made by the New York State Legislature […]

Read More >

Convention of States “Reopen America” Ploy

“I don’t think it’s helpful to encourage demonstrations and encourage people to go against the president’s own policy,” Maryland Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican, said. “It just doesn’t make any sense.”   And yet, that is what is happening around the country as Facebook groups and special interest lobbying organizations are engineering protests at capitols around the nation for states continuing stay-at-home orders as […]

Read More >

Explaining Ron DeSantis’ effort to call a convention of states and amend the US Constitution

Explaining Ron DeSantis’ effort to call a convention of states and amend the US Constitution PolitiFact February 1, 2024 By Louis Jacobson and Samantha Putterman He dropped out of the 2024 presidential race, but Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who had pushed to “make America Florida,” is still aiming to shape national policy. DeSantis is proposing […]

Read More >

Turning to a Convention of States in Times of National Crisis is Not the Answer

Turning to a Convention of States in Times of National Crisis is Not the Answer By Dorothy Moon, IDGOP Chairwoman January 4, 2023 Our country is in a rough place right now, perhaps the worst since the Civil War. Spending is out of control, our southern border is wide open, and Congress seems to be […]

Read More >

‘Convention of States’ a dangerous, untested effort to rewrite our Constitution | Opinion

‘Convention of States’ a dangerous, untested effort to rewrite our Constitution | Opinion At a time when extreme gerrymandering has created unprecedented polarization and big money buys access and influence, a potentially destabilizing constitutional convention is the last thing we need Mia Lewis Opinion contributor I read Dan Sewell’s July 14 column on the Convention […]

Read More >

Scholars Invite Mark Meckler to Debate a Constitutional Convention

A public debate is slated for Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 5 pm MST in the Lincoln Room of the Idaho Legislature. This forum will offer both sides the opportunity to discuss the merits of the proposed Article V Constitutional Convention, or Convention of States, now being pushed through legislatures across the country.   A constitutional convention could put all our rights […]

Read More >

Stay Connected

We need your help before it's too late. Join our mailing list to receive important updates and help us mobilize.