fbpx

Stopping a Dangerous Article V Convention

The only way to defend our values against this threat is if ordinary people like us step up to make a difference. Join the fight today.

Save the Constitution. GOP and Dem legislators agree: Don’t be conned by the Con-Con | Opinion

BY REP. ILANA RUBEL AND REP. JUDY BOYLE
FEBRUARY 18, 2024

“Washington at Constitutional Convention of 1787, signing of U.S. Constitution” by Junius Brutus Stearns Public Domain We are of different political parties and often disagree, but are allied in our fierce devotion to America’s Constitution. It is now under serious threat from well-meaning people who seek a Constitutional Convention.

There are two ways to alter the U.S. Constitution. The first –and only way our Constitution has ever been amended in its 237-year history – is for Congress to propose an amendment and pass it by a two-thirds vote. Then three-fourths of the states must ratify. Everybody sees the amendment language and knows exactly what they’re voting on.

But there’s another untested way to alter the Constitution. A Constitutional Convention, or “Con-Con”, can be requested by two-thirds of the state legislatures. There has only been one such Convention – when the Constitution was written in 1787. Unlike the amendment approach, a Con-Con opens up the whole Constitution to be rewritten as the delegates decide. Alterations could not be reliably limited to a particular, known proposal; delegates could concoct changes on the fly to anything or everything. There are no set rules determining how the delegates holding such staggering power would be chosen. We would be counting on a dysfunctional Congress to set these rules.

This session, three resolutions are pending in the Idaho Senate calling for a Con-Con: SCR112, SCR114 and SCR115. Advocates will assure you that their sole purpose is to pass a balanced budget amendment or some other benign-sounding tweak. But there is no basis to believe that the agenda can be safely contained. Once a Convention is called, everything is on the chopping block. The Constitutional protection of our rights – free speech, gun rights, a jury of our peers – all could be restricted or even eliminated by unelected delegates. Even the ratification requirement by three-quarters of the states could be removed.

History rebuts the idea that in a Con-Con, delegates’ powers could be restricted to a single item. The original 1787 Constitutional Convention was called solely to ratify the Articles of Confederation, but the delegates ignored that limitation and drafted our current Constitution, including new ratification rules. Top legal scholars across the ideological spectrum, from Justice Scalia to Harvard’s Professor Tribe, have agreed that subject limitations could not be enforced once a Constitutional Convention begins.

If you think this sounds far-fetched, think again. Twenty-seven states have already called for a Con-Con, and once that number hits thirty-four, Congress must convene it. Idaho is one of only seven states standing in the way of a potential gutting of our founding document, and proponents are working overtime to hit the tipping point. Some powerful Idaho legislators have this as a top priority for this session.

The public must loudly tell their legislators not to risk a runaway convention that could gut our precious Constitution. We agree that federal debt should be reined in and government could be improved across the board. But there are many ways to do so without taking unconscionable risks with the document that is the foundation of America’s freedom and prosperity. This is not a partisan issue — it’s a matter that ought to concern all Americans.

Our Founding Fathers created the Con-Con option to use in case the American experiment proved to be a failure and needed a complete overhaul. That is not the case. Our nation is an unprecedented success. America has been a beacon of freedom for centuries and remains the wealthiest, most powerful nation on Earth. We cannot stand by and watch the uniquely inspired document that enabled this success placed at risk. Let’s solve our problems using the many political tools we already have, and not jeopardize our Constitution.

Rep. Ilana Rubel is a Democrat from Boise. Rep. Judy Boyle is a Republican from Midvale.

Related News

Article V Proponent Mark Meckler Takes Over as Right-Wing Media CEO

Americans deserve a free and fair democracy that is brought to them through factual information and trusted leadership. However, with the re-emergence of Parler under the direction of a known right-wing extremist figure that is actively working to dismantle those very rights, only further proves that the site is not intended to engage in dialogue. […]

Read More >

‘Convention of States’ a dangerous, untested effort to rewrite our Constitution | Opinion

‘Convention of States’ a dangerous, untested effort to rewrite our Constitution | Opinion At a time when extreme gerrymandering has created unprecedented polarization and big money buys access and influence, a potentially destabilizing constitutional convention is the last thing we need Mia Lewis Opinion contributor I read Dan Sewell’s July 14 column on the Convention […]

Read More >

Op-Ed by New Jersey Leadership Highlights Threat of Article V Convention

Just before the new year, New Jersey became the latest state to rescind all calls for a constitutional convention. In doing so, New Jersey takes part in removing applications asking for a constitutional convention that, if it were to happen, leaves the door wide open for a complete runaway convention that has the power to […]

Read More >

Explaining Ron DeSantis’ effort to call a convention of states and amend the US Constitution

Explaining Ron DeSantis’ effort to call a convention of states and amend the US Constitution PolitiFact February 1, 2024 By Louis Jacobson and Samantha Putterman He dropped out of the 2024 presidential race, but Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who had pushed to “make America Florida,” is still aiming to shape national policy. DeSantis is proposing […]

Read More >

South Dakota rescission vote shows how complex the issue of an Article V constitutional convention really is

Last week, the South Dakota state senate held a vote on SJR 503 – legislation that would rescind all applications South Dakota has for an Article V constitutional convention. In January, South Dakota had introduced HJR 5001, a resolution that would have added their names to the Convention of States initiative, which seeks to call a dangerous Article V convention […]

Read More >

Colorado Rescinds Calls for Article V Constitutional Convention

Last week, lawmakers in Colorado took the important action of rescinding all of Colorado’s previous calls for an Article V constitutional convention. This crucial legislation removes Colorado from the dangerous equation many state legislatures have fallen prey to by wealthy special interests looking to start a constitutional convention when they hit the 34 state threshold […]

Read More >

New Polling Shows Americans Oppose Changing Constitution Through Convention

Americans across the political spectrum believe our constitutional rights must be protected and oppose calling a new constitutional convention to change the Constitution, according to new polling conducted last month. Research by J. Wallin Opinion Research concludes that after the tumultuous year marked by a national election, civil rights demonstrations, and a historic health pandemic, […]

Read More >

The Legislature’s con-con con job | Editorial

The Legislature’s con-con con job | Editorial By SUN SENTINEL EDITORIAL BOARD | Sun Sentinel PUBLISHED: January 4, 2024 at 11:59 a.m. | UPDATED: January 4, 2024 at 12:05 p.m. The 2024 Florida legislative session kicks into gear Tuesday, and the opening day’s agenda tells you all you need to know about what deserves immediate […]

Read More >

Stay Connected

We need your help before it's too late. Join our mailing list to receive important updates and help us mobilize.