fbpx

Stopping a Dangerous Article V Convention

The only way to defend our values against this threat is if ordinary people like us step up to make a difference. Join the fight today.

State House unanimously agrees: CT does not support a ‘world government’

April 30, 2025
State House unanimously agrees: CT does not support a ‘world government’
By David Krechevsky

A “world federal government” sounds a lot like a dark web conspiracy theory.

For Connecticut, though, it’s a remnant of the past that needed to be purged.

During Monday’s state House of Representatives session, the chamber considered House Joint Resolution 49, which came with a lengthy title:

“Resolution Rescinding Previous Applications of the General Assembly that Called for an Article V Convention to Propose Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and Directing Transmission of Such Resolution to Congress for Printing in the Congressional Record.”

As explained by Rep. Matt Blumenthal (D-Stamford), the resolution is intended to rescind two calls for a federal constitutional convention, or Article V convention, that were called during the state legislature in the late 1940s and 1950s to do two things:

Authorize the United States to negotiate with other countries to draft a constitution for a world federal government (approved in 1949), and
Prohibit states from taxing the income of nonstate residents (approved in 1958).

According to various sources on the web, in 1949 Connecticut joined five other states — California, Florida, Maine, New Jersey and North Carolina — that applied for an Article V convention to propose an amendment “to enable the participation of the United States in a world federal government.”

“We have decided that those calls were not well-founded,” Blumenthal told the House on Monday, “and so this resolution would rescind those calls and issue notification to all the relevant parties.”

He also noted that, to date, the U.S. has never held an Article V convention, which requires applications by two-thirds of the states.

“An Article V convention is something we have not had since the founding of this country under its current constitution,” Blumenthal said. “Nobody knows how it would work; there’s one paragraph in the constitution about it. Suffice it to say, these two calls for constitutional conventions are not ones that I think the legislature or the people of Connecticut would support today, whatever they thought in the 1940s and 1950s. And so, we would under this resolution rescind our calls for that convention.”

After approving a minor amendment to the resolution, Rep. Tom O’Dea (R-New Canaan) rose to address the chamber.

“I carry around a copy of the Constitution and I’m embarrassed to say I did not know that the state of Connecticut had called for a convention to negotiate a world federal government,” O’Dea said.

“I think we’re going to see a whole board of green very soon,” he added, referring to the electronic board that records votes in the chamber, with green for “yea” and red for “nay.”

“There’s not a single person in this room (who) wants a world federal government,” O’Dea said. “So, I’m urging my colleagues to support this and show me the green.”

They did, approving the resolution by a 145-0 vote with six members not voting.

Related News

Turning to a Convention of States in Times of National Crisis is Not the Answer

Turning to a Convention of States in Times of National Crisis is Not the Answer By Dorothy Moon, IDGOP Chairwoman January 4, 2023 Our country is in a rough place right now, perhaps the worst since the Civil War. Spending is out of control, our southern border is wide open, and Congress seems to be […]

Read More >

Assembly Passes Resolution Ensuring Decades Old Calls for Constitutional Conventions Aren’t Manipulated for Future, Unrelated Purposes

News Release Assembly Speaker Carl E. Heastie FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 20, 2024 Assembly Passes Resolution Ensuring Decades Old Calls for Constitutional Conventions Aren’t Manipulated for Future, Unrelated Purposes Speaker Carl Heastie and Assemblymember Ken Zebrowski today announced that the Assembly passed a resolution rescinding all previous applications made by the New York State Legislature […]

Read More >

COLUMN: Say “no” to a Constitutional Convention

COLUMN: Say “no” to a Constitutional Convention April 28, 2025 A “Con-Con” would be a con game By Bob Confer Going back to the start of the Tea Party movement in 2007, something that has been in and out of the public conversation has been the promotion, by some folks of right persuasion (specifically Republicans […]

Read More >

Convention of States “Reopen America” Ploy

“I don’t think it’s helpful to encourage demonstrations and encourage people to go against the president’s own policy,” Maryland Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican, said. “It just doesn’t make any sense.”   And yet, that is what is happening around the country as Facebook groups and special interest lobbying organizations are engineering protests at capitols around the nation for states continuing stay-at-home orders as […]

Read More >

Maryland Attorney General Warns of the Dangers of an Article V Convention

Just two years after Maryland rescinded the state’s application for an Article V convention, legislators are again considering calling for a convention. This time, though, Maryland legislators want the convention to be focused on campaign finance reform. While we all agree that we must change our campaign finance system, trying to change it in a […]

Read More >

Guest commentary: Article V convention fails in Idaho

Guest commentary: Article V convention fails in Idaho By DOROTHY MOON Mar 29, 2025 The Idaho House overwhelmingly rejected House Concurrent Resolution 10, aimed at petitioning Congress to call an Article V Convention of States. This is a decisive victory for Idahoans by safeguarding America’s Constitution. The resolution failed by a significant margin, 44 nays […]

Read More >

‘Convention of States’ a dangerous, untested effort to rewrite our Constitution | Opinion

‘Convention of States’ a dangerous, untested effort to rewrite our Constitution | Opinion At a time when extreme gerrymandering has created unprecedented polarization and big money buys access and influence, a potentially destabilizing constitutional convention is the last thing we need Mia Lewis Opinion contributor I read Dan Sewell’s July 14 column on the Convention […]

Read More >

South Dakota rescission vote shows how complex the issue of an Article V constitutional convention really is

Last week, the South Dakota state senate held a vote on SJR 503 – legislation that would rescind all applications South Dakota has for an Article V constitutional convention. In January, South Dakota had introduced HJR 5001, a resolution that would have added their names to the Convention of States initiative, which seeks to call a dangerous Article V convention […]

Read More >

Stay Connected

We need your help before it's too late. Join our mailing list to receive important updates and help us mobilize.