fbpx

Stopping a Dangerous Article V Convention

The only way to defend our values against this threat is if ordinary people like us step up to make a difference. Join the fight today.

Now is Not the Time to Rewrite the U.S. Constitution

Guest commentary by Justin Pidot, professor of law and the co-director of the Environmental Law Program at the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law

 

In this politically fractured time, some state legislatures have called for a convention to rewrite the U.S. Constitution. Article V of the Constitution provides for such a process, but a convention has never before been convened and, and if it occurred, would have no set rules, no predictable outcome. Yet plausible changes, consistent with the passionate views held by a few, could produce catastrophic results for the environment. Here I consider three.

First, what if the Commerce Clause only allowed regulation of the transportation and sale of goods across state lines? Such is the view that Justice Thomas has expressed in dissenting opinions about our current Constitution. Implementing it would radically diminish Congress’s power, and environmental law would be among the causalities, because protecting air, water, soils, and species cannot be accomplished through mere product regulation.

States could not fill the vacuum left by constrained federal power. They could continue to regulate within their boundaries, but environmental problems often cross jurisdictions. Indeed, disputes over transboundary pollution pre-dated modern environmental law by decades. In 1907, Georgia sued a Tennessee copper company, because toxic fumes caused injuries in five counties. Federal common law provided redress then, and the Clean Air Act does so now.

Second, what if the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause required compensation whenever regulation depresses property value? Such a rule is the dream of many libertarians, who argue that it would lead to efficient regulation. Its implications could be even more dramatic than rewriting the Commerce Clause. Virtually every environmental law requires economic actors to spend money to address the harms they cause, and those costs can often be described in terms of depressing the value of regulated businesses. The cost to the federal treasury of enforcing just one environmental law could result in bankruptcy, if every regulated entity could claim compensation.

Rewriting the Takings Clause would likely extend beyond the federal government, because its provisions apply to state and local governments too. We know the likely result, because a few states have experimented with expansive compensation regimes. When Oregon did so, first the state virtually abandoned application of its growth management law, because it could not afford to pay, and then the people voted to abandon the regime. Moreover, this rule would have deeply regressive consequences; wealthy communities might have the funds available to purchase environmental protection, but poorer communities will not.

Third, what if the Property Clause did not allow the United States to retain ownership of public lands? Such is the view of many sagebrush rebels, who believe that public lands should be privatized or turned over to states. Yet America is defined, at least in part, by the national parks, wildlife refuges, monuments, that are the birthright of every American. Our public lands should be for all of us. Yellowstone and Yosemite should not be sold to the highest bidder, destined for use only by the wealthiest among us.

The Constitution has been the foundation of our Democracy for more than two hundred years, serving us in times times of prosperity and crisis. It has been amended from time to time to better serve our nation’s founding principles of liberty, equality, and justice for all. But it has never been subjected to wholesale revision through a convention. Doing so now is wildly risky and wholly unnecessary and, if a convention were to occur, environmental law would be just one among many potential casualties.

Related News

The Wisconsin Assembly just approved a resolution to call a dangerous Article V convention – what happens now?

AJR-77, a resolution calling for an Article V constitutional convention, was passed in the State House last week, February 18. The vote in the house was 60-38. The House is 63 R – 36 D, meaning some Republicans votedagainst this application for a convention.  Wisconsin already has an active convention resolution for the Balanced Budget Amendment, passed in 2017. Former […]

Read More >

Exposed: The Convention of States, a Campaign to Undermine 115 Years of Progressivism

This proposal calls for a convention with the broad purpose of limiting the powers of the federal government, imposing fiscal restraints on federal spending, and applying term limits for Members of Congress. Embedded within the legislation of this resolution is vague language lawmakers have intentionally placed – thus illustrating the very real possibility of a […]

Read More >

Republican & Democratic Legislators Agree: An Article V Convention Is A Bad Idea

In their own words, Republican and Democratic state legislators from across the country have warned about the dangers of calling an Article V constitutional convention: “It’s like playing Russian roulette. We kind of think it would work out well. You put a bullet in one chamber, the odds of it working are pretty good. But […]

Read More >

Do you know what your legislators are working on?

The Constitution has our rights and values woven through it so carefully and so cautiously because of the immense strength it needs to uphold the pillars of our democracy.   But these rights and the values at the core of our nation, the freedom of speech and freedom of religion, and right to vote, are now at stake. With […]

Read More >

Scholars Invite Mark Meckler to Debate a Constitutional Convention

A public debate is slated for Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 5 pm MST in the Lincoln Room of the Idaho Legislature. This forum will offer both sides the opportunity to discuss the merits of the proposed Article V Constitutional Convention, or Convention of States, now being pushed through legislatures across the country.   A constitutional convention could put all our rights […]

Read More >

New Hampshire’s upcoming vote to rescind calls for a constitutional convention affects us all

This legislative season in New Hampshire has been busy when it comes to the dangerous push for an Article V constitutional convention. HCR 6 and the call for a constitutional convention was handily defeated in a bipartisan manner with a vote of 318-27.  While this was a great win for New Hampshire because it did not add any new calls to their roster, they still have existing applications for a convention […]

Read More >

South Dakota rescission vote shows how complex the issue of an Article V constitutional convention really is

Last week, the South Dakota state senate held a vote on SJR 503 – legislation that would rescind all applications South Dakota has for an Article V constitutional convention. In January, South Dakota had introduced HJR 5001, a resolution that would have added their names to the Convention of States initiative, which seeks to call a dangerous Article V convention […]

Read More >

Convention of States “Reopen America” Ploy

“I don’t think it’s helpful to encourage demonstrations and encourage people to go against the president’s own policy,” Maryland Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican, said. “It just doesn’t make any sense.”   And yet, that is what is happening around the country as Facebook groups and special interest lobbying organizations are engineering protests at capitols around the nation for states continuing stay-at-home orders as […]

Read More >

Stay Connected

We need your help before it's too late. Join our mailing list to receive important updates and help us mobilize.