fbpx

Stopping a Dangerous Article V Convention

The only way to defend our values against this threat is if ordinary people like us step up to make a difference. Join the fight today.

Exposed: The Balanced Budget Amendment Convention Campaign

Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, wealthy special interest groups convinced dozens of state legislatures to pass resolutions or “calls” for an Article V convention to propose a balanced budget amendment (BBA). At one point, BBA advocates were just a few states short of reaching the constitutionally required 34 state required to call a convention. However, due to concerns about a potential runaway convention, plus an intensified drive to push BBA through Congress, over a dozen states rescinded their convention calls between 1989 and 2010. 

This pro-convention campaign is the one that has progressed the furthest and it works to add a federal balanced budget amendment to the Constitution. 

In recent years conservative interest groups have revived the convention plan and have persuaded more than a dozen state legislatures to pass Article V convention calls since 2011. As of today, BBA convention proponents claim that 28 states have “active” or “live” applications on the books for an Article V convention on a balanced budget – just six states away from the 34 needed to call a convention.

The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a corporate lobbying group hiding under the guise of a charity, has endorsed the Article V BBA campaign and given it a boost. ALEC, which has close connections with and is funded by the Koch network, has become one of the most effective lobbying tools of the conservative convention proponents.

The campaign for an Article V convention on a balanced budget amendment is primarily being organized by the Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force (BBATF) and its affiliate, the Center for State-Led National Debt Solutions (CSNDS). In 2019, former Governor Scott Walker (R-WI) became the national honorary chair of CSNDS. The Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force was previously led by Scott Rogers, who later publicly reversed his position and admitted the real threats of a convention. The BBA Task Force’s campaign for a convention “became less about reforming our nation’s government, but a vehicle to limit and destroy the power of the federal government,” Rogers said.

The proponents for a BBA convention claim a convention can be limited to just one issue – the balanced budget amendment. Unfortunately, though, the Constitution provides no guidelines for a convention would work and what rules, if any, would be in place.

A federal balanced budget amendment itself isn’t all that great of an idea either. It’s imperative to remember that the Constitution is a governing document, it wasn’t created to guide fiscal decisions. Economists have found that a balanced budget amendment, if even enforceable, would sabotage the economy and hurt working families and the middle class by forcing cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and other essential programs everyday Americans rely on. The BBA would also limit our nation’s ability to respond to national emergencies or disasters. A federal balanced budget amendment would not allow for flexibility to respond appropriately to sudden changes in the economy, natural disasters, or national security threats. 

While proponents will argue this is akin to American families balancing their checkbooks, the analogy provides a false narrative and is misleading. As well as building reserve funds, state governments often borrow money to finance building roads, schools, and other public projects. Most American families borrow money for mortgages, student loans, and other investments. Under a constitutional balanced budget amendment, the federal government would not be able to borrow to finance a response to a national security threat or boost economic growth. 

Ultimately, the push for a constitutional convention on a balanced budget isn’t just about fiscal policy – it’s about putting all of our constitutional rights up for grabs. And now, the proponents for a balanced budget amendment convention are exploring new ways to rig the application count in order to force Congress to call a convention.

Rob Natelson, a conservative legal scholar that has advised the Article V convention movement, recently wrote an article claiming that the “true count” to the constitutionally-required 34 states to call a convention is already 33 by adding the BBA applications and other older general convention applications. Natelson’s “fuzzy math” is alarming as conservative special interests try to change the rules – or just make up new ones – on how to call a convention. 

In addition, groups such as the Consumer Action for a Strong Economy, Taxpayers Protection Alliance, and the Job Creators Network, among others, have written letters to both Vice President Pence and Former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan asking them to advance a constitutional convention. These groups believe that, according to Natelson’s math, calls for a convention have reached the necessary amount of states needed to proceed. This is an urgent matter – as many people are contacting some of the highest office holders in the nation to make a convention happen. 

In order to stop this convention, the Defend Our Constitution coalition and other groups have pushed states to rescind Article V convention BBA applications. In the last few years, Delaware, New Mexico, Nevada, and Maryland have all successfully passed resolutions. These rescissions have been crucial in the effort to stop a convention from being called and protecting every Americans’ constitutional rights and civil liberties.

Related News

Republican & Democratic Legislators Agree: An Article V Convention Is A Bad Idea

In their own words, Republican and Democratic state legislators from across the country have warned about the dangers of calling an Article V constitutional convention: “It’s like playing Russian roulette. We kind of think it would work out well. You put a bullet in one chamber, the odds of it working are pretty good. But […]

Read More >

South Dakota rescission vote shows how complex the issue of an Article V constitutional convention really is

Last week, the South Dakota state senate held a vote on SJR 503 – legislation that would rescind all applications South Dakota has for an Article V constitutional convention. In January, South Dakota had introduced HJR 5001, a resolution that would have added their names to the Convention of States initiative, which seeks to call a dangerous Article V convention […]

Read More >

KC Becker: Constitutional convention could spell chaos for democracy

KC Becker, who lives in Boulder and represents District 13, is the now the Speaker of the Colorado House of Representatives. She penned this op-ed on September 25, 2018, while majority leader. We deserve a democracy that puts hardworking Coloradans ahead of wealthy special interests and the well-connected. No one can deny the powerful influence […]

Read More >

Convention of States “Reopen America” Ploy

“I don’t think it’s helpful to encourage demonstrations and encourage people to go against the president’s own policy,” Maryland Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican, said. “It just doesn’t make any sense.”   And yet, that is what is happening around the country as Facebook groups and special interest lobbying organizations are engineering protests at capitols around the nation for states continuing stay-at-home orders as […]

Read More >

Breaking: New Polling Shows Majority of Republican Voters Oppose Changing Constitution through an Article V Constitutional Convention

A new national poll done by J. Wallin Opinion Research revealed a majority (59.2%) of Republican voters oppose changing the U.S. Constitution by calling an Article V Constitutional Convention. Further evidence in the poll shows the reluctance of Republican voters to take drastic steps to alter this foundational document.  Protecting and preserving the rights guaranteed […]

Read More >

Now is Not the Time to Rewrite the U.S. Constitution

Guest commentary by Justin Pidot, professor of law and the co-director of the Environmental Law Program at the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law   In this politically fractured time, some state legislatures have called for a convention to rewrite the U.S. Constitution. Article V of the Constitution provides for such a process, […]

Read More >

Scholars Invite Mark Meckler to Debate a Constitutional Convention

A public debate is slated for Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 5 pm MST in the Lincoln Room of the Idaho Legislature. This forum will offer both sides the opportunity to discuss the merits of the proposed Article V Constitutional Convention, or Convention of States, now being pushed through legislatures across the country.   A constitutional convention could put all our rights […]

Read More >

Legislators in West Virginia Have a Fight on Their Hands

Some lawmakers in West Virginia are, like many other state legislators across the country, fighting against the dangerous call their state has made for an Article V constitutional convention.   This call for a constitutional convention, or Convention of States, is a well-funded campaign led by Tea Party Patriots co-founder Mark Meckler, Texas mega donor Tim Dunn, […]

Read More >

Stay Connected

We need your help before it's too late. Join our mailing list to receive important updates and help us mobilize.